makakamis

[PaPi]

minsan namimis ko ang ex wife ko at ang anak ko...

sobrang nakakamis.. kasi kahit kapitbahay ko, di ko mapuntahan...

mis ko si jag and trix...

http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs384.snc3/23490_105060942851653_100000432431676_128839_13554 33_n.jpg

[NAYN]

:( wawa naman papikoh nahohome-sex na=))

X_X

[xunil]

ang sobrang cute ng bata............

[ayasha]

so cute namn ng baby mo kuya papi...anlapit lang namn pla eh....pwd mong puntahan....hihihihi

[baby_maker82]

wawa ka naman sir..puntahan mo nalang..magdala lang ng peace offering kahit sa bata lang..siguro naman di na ipagkait sayo yun...

[PaPi]

so cute namn ng baby mo kuya papi...anlapit lang namn pla eh....pwd mong puntahan....hihihihi

baka magalit ang boyfriend niya hehehe

[ArTanGeL]

Dadalaw lang naman sa anak niyo diba? wala naman sigurong masama don?

[xunil]

magagamit ang 80 units mo sa LAW niyan.....under the family code of the Philippines...may karapatan kang bumisita at suportahan financially....but let us not talk about support...The right to visitation and the duty to pay child support are distinct and separate


kasal ba kayo?

or
kahit hindi kayo kasal, hindi nangangahulugan na wala kang karapatan o responsibility sa bata....

pag lumaki yan....malalaman din niya na ikaw iyong gwapong ama....at pwede na siyang mamimili kung saan siya sasama o titira...

dahil sanggol pa, parental authority will be given to the mother of your child as stated in the provision


The general rule is that a child under seven years of age shall not be separated from his mother, which is based on the basic need of a child for his mother’s loving care. Article 213 of the Family Code provides that “[n]o child under seven years of age shall be separated from the mother, unless the court finds compelling reasons to order otherwise.” This is more pronounced in case of illegitimate children, as the law expressly provides that illegitimate children shall be under the parental authority of their mother

pinagbawalan ka bang bumisita?


The Supreme Court, through Justice Artemio Panganiban, in the 2004 case of Briones vs. Miguel stated the fundamental rule (based on Article 176 of the Family Code) on a mother's parental authority over an ilegitimate child:

“An illegitimate child is under the sole parental authority of the mother. In the exercise of that authority, she is entitled to keep the child in her company. The Court will not deprive her of custody, absent any imperative cause showing her unfitness to exercise such authority and care.”

The question is, does the biological father have any visitation rights over his illegitimate child? The term “visitation right” means “the right of access of a noncustodial parent to his or her child or children”. The Supreme Court in the1997 case of Silva v. Court of Appeals sustained the visitorial right of a father over his illegitimate children in view of the constitutionally protected inherent and natural right of parents over their children. The Court clarified that

“Parents have the natural right, as well as the moral and legal duty, to care for their children, see to their proper upbringing and safeguard their best interest and welfare. This authority and responsibility may not be unduly denied the parents; neither may it be renounced by them. Even when the parents are estranged and their affection for each other is lost, their attachment to and feeling for their offspring remain unchanged. Neither the law nor the courts allow this affinity to suffer, absent any real, grave or imminent threat to the well-being of the child.”

Clarifications on the Supreme Court’s ruling on visitation rights

[1] Visitation rights and parental authority: As pointed out above, parental authority over an illegitimate child belongs to the mother. Silva may have won with the Supreme Court’s upholding of his visitation rights, but this favorable decision did not prevent Suzanne in the exercise of her parental authority from immigrating to Holland with her two children.

[2] No need to go to court if the mother and father can agree: If the mother and the father of the illegitimate child can agree amicably on the terms and conditions of the father’s visitation rights, then there will be no problem. In case of disagreement however, the father has to file a petition asking the court to settle the issue of visitation rights.

[3] Can a father be denied visitation rights? The Supreme Court in its Silva ruling stated that Suzanne’s fears and apprehensions were unfounded as to the father’s corrupting influence over the children. If it is proven therefore that indeed the father is a negative influence (because of reasons like immorality, drunkenness, etc) on the children, the trial court, taking into consideration the best interest of the children, can deny his petition for the exrcise of his visitation rights.

[4] Is the mother’s written consent always necessary before the father can take his illegitimate child out? Does the Silva vs. CA ruling of the Supreme Court mean that in all other cases the mother’s written permission must always be obtained before the father can take his illegitimate child out? As you can read from the excerpts of the SC decision above, the Quezon City RTC imposed this precautionary measure in view of Suzanne’s apprehensions over the negative influence of Silva’s alleged womanizing.

In one case, the Court of Appeals ruled that such written consent was not mandatory if the facts are not similar to the Silva case, that is, the mother had reasonable apprehensions over the welfare of her children. If the facts are not the same, then trial court judges handling the petition for visitation rights may or may not impose the condition of the mother’s written permission. (The Supreme Court of course may in the proper case uphold or reject this position of the Court of Appeals.)